USPTO serial 87795712
DREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW D. SKALE
ANDREW D. SKALE MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; all-purpose athletic bags; all-purpose carrying bags; athletic bags; book bags; bags for sports clothing; bags for sports; beach bags; carry-all bags; carry-on bags; duffel bags; duffel bags for travel; flexible garment bags for travel; garment bags for travel; gym bags; messenger bags; school bags; school book bags; shoulder bags; sling bags; tote bags; travel bags; handbags; school satchels; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coasters not of paper and not being table linen, namely, plastic coasters; bottle openers; beverage glassware, namely, cups, mugs, drinking glasses, pint glasses; porcelain, namely, mugs, thermo-insulated containers for beverages; insulated mugs; thermal insulated bottles sold empty; drinking glasses, namely, drinking tumblers; eyeglass cleaning cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 9, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |