USPTO serial 87796556
BLUE GLARE BLOCKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE GLARE BLOCKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tony W. Wong
TONY W. WONG D&R I.P. LAW FIRM108 N YNEZ AVESUITE 128MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass chains and cords; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lanyards; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglass retaining cords; Eyeglasses; Reading glasses; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass cords; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Antireflection coated eyeglasses; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Chains for eyeglasses; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Floatable sunglasses; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Glacier eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for cutting, drilling, marking, engraving and shaping optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for engraving and tinting optical lenses for eyeglasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Magnifying glasses that fit on the user's face in the manner of eyeglasses; Nose guards which can be worn by attachment to eyewear such as sunglasses and ski goggles; Novelty eyeglasses; Protective eyeglasses; Reading eyeglasses; Side guards for eyeglasses; Spectacles; Spectacles and sunglasses; Sports training eyeglasses; Video displays mounted in eyeglasses; Anti-glare glasses; Protective films adapted for computer screens; computer glasses | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |