Drawing for PICA PARALLEL INTEGRATED CHIP ASSEMBLY

USPTO serial 87799854

PICA PARALLEL INTEGRATED CHIP ASSEMBLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PICA PARALLEL INTEGRATED CHIP ASSEMBLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Weaver

JEFFREY S. WEAVER FIALA & WEAVER P.L.L.C.C/O CPA GLOBAL900 SECOND AVENUE S., SUITE 600MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Assembly lines, namely, a series of machines for assembling a sub-component which when assembled onto a substrate becomes part of a device that uses electrical energy to perform a functional task, integrated circuit chips on substrates, RFID tags, and transponders in successive stages; Machines for manufacturing semiconductors; Semiconductor manufacturing machines; Semiconductor substrates manufacturing machines; Semiconductor wafer processing equipmentACTIVE
009Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags; TranspondersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 28, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 28, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 16, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 16, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 31, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance