Drawing for STACKING DIMES

USPTO serial 87800765

STACKING DIMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STACKING DIMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Moldovanyi

Jay Moldovanyi FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid Ave. 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stickers and decalsACTIVE
025Clothing namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hoodies; headwear namely, hats, caps, beanies and toquesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 3, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 26, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 22, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 22, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 25, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 25, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 25, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 25, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 25, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 25, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 25, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 20, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance