Drawing for HEDERA HASHGRAPH COUNCIL

USPTO serial 87803633

HEDERA HASHGRAPH COUNCIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEDERA HASHGRAPH COUNCIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shane Rumbaugh

Shane Rumbaugh COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platforms for distributed consensus computing; computer application software for distributed ledger based platforms, namely, software for using a consensus engine incorporating distributed ledger technology for cryptographically securing dataACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring computer software provided via the internet and other computer and electronic communication networks; promoting public awareness of distributed ledger technologyACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing training in the fields of computer software and distributed ledger technologyACTIVE—
042Design, development, and implementation of software for distributed computing platforms; design, development, and implementation of software for distributed ledger technology; research and development of computer software; software development and product development consulting in the field of distributed computing platforms; providing a website featuring information about distributed ledger computing; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for distributed ledger technology, cryptocurrency, virtual currency, and digital tokens, namely, software for authenticating, facilitating, and processing data; platform as a service featuring computer software platforms for distributed ledger technology and authenticating, facilitating and processing data in the fields of cryptocurrency, virtual currency, and digital tokens; providing information in the field of computer software and distributed ledger technology; computer services, consisting of managing computer networks, namely, computer networks with distributed ledger based platformsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 5, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance