Drawing for Serial No. 87804695

USPTO serial 87804695

Serial No. 87804695

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 87804695?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colette A. Durst

COLETTE A. DURST JOHNSON CONTROLS6600 CONGRESS AVENUEBOCA RATON, FL 33487UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic controlling devices, both wireless and wired, for controlling energy management systems and security systems which involve on-site and remote monitoring, control, operation, automation, and optimization of, and interaction with, building, facility, and plant devices, apparatus and systems for heating, air conditioning, ventilation, refrigeration, energy use, allocation, maintenance, efficiency and stabilization, lighting, sound, communication, luminescent display, audio and video broadcast, battery and storage cell electrical charging, metering and payment, fire and smoke detection, alarm, suppression, containment and control, water flow, emergency evacuation, security access and alarms, CCTV, surveillance, asset and personnel tracking, light and motion detection, moisture detection, environmental hazard detection, threat detection and safety, gas detection, alarm and containment, asset management, manufacturing, and equipment and systems fault detectionACTIVEApr 7, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 17, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 19, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 6, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2018AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance