Drawing for DISCREET+

USPTO serial 87806464

DISCREET+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCREET+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner, Esq.

MARK LERNER, ESQ. SATTERLEE STEPHENS LLP230 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Dust masks; protection masks; respiratory masks, for non-medical purposes; filters for non-medical respiratory masks; anti-pollution masks for respiratory protection; respirators, other than for artificial respiration; instruments, indicators and controllers for measuring, detecting and monitoring pollution levels in the environmentACTIVE—
010Sanitary masks for dust prevention for medical purposes; protective nose masks for medical use; protective breathing masks for medical applications; protective breathing masks made of non-woven materials for medical applications; respirators for medical purposes; therapeutic nose clips and nasal filters worn on the nose for the prevention of exposure to pollutants and for medical use; electronic devices for monitoring air in the immediate environment for medical use; medical ventilatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance