USPTO serial 87806868
PHILLY SPECIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHILLY SPECIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cakes not including cheesecakes or cakes containing cream cheese icing; Candies; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; Chocolate; Coffee; Ice cream not featuring cream cheese; Pie crusts; Pie shells; Pies, namely, pecan and fruit pies; Popcorn; Pretzel chips; Pretzels; Tea; Frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Chocolate candies; Chocolate covered pretzels; Corn cakes containing combinations of meat, cheese, beans and/or vegetables; Corn chips; Corn-based chips; Flour-based chips; Grain-based chips; Hard candies; Popped popcorn; Processed popcorn; Rice chips; Seasoned popcorn; Soft pretzels; Unpopped popcorn; White chocolate chips | ABANDONED | Feb 4, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |