USPTO serial 87807749
HALLOWEENPARTYONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HALLOWEENPARTYONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Y. Kim
JAMES Y. KIM AGORA LAW, LLC2020 MALTBY RDSTE 7 PMB 163BOTHELL, WA 98021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Costumes for use in children's dress up play; Costumes for use in role-playing games; Costumes for use in the amusement industry; Ballroom dancing uniforms; Bathing costumes; Bathing costumes for women; Camp shirts; Clothing, namely, folk costumes; Dance costumes; Dresses; Halloween costumes; Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewith; Infant wearable blankets; Masquerade costumes; Masquerade costumes and masks sold in connection therewith; Night gowns; Rubber and latex costumes for use in the fashion industry; Swimming costumes; Wedding gowns | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, hair sticks; Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, jaw clips; Hair accessories, namely, plastic styling inserts that create height and volume on the crown of the head; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair bows; Hair bows of paper; Hair buckles; Hair chopsticks; Hair clamps; Hair clips; Hair coloring caps; Hair coloring foils; Hair colouring caps; Hair curl clips; Hair curl papers; Hair curling papers; Hair elastics; Hair extensions; Hair frosting caps; Hair grips; Hair nets; Hair netting; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair pins; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Hair ribbons for Japanese hair styling (tegara); Hair ribbons of paper; Hair rods; Hair scrunchies; Hair slides; Hair tassel strings for Japanese hair styling (motoyui); Hair weaves; Wig caps; Wigs; Bows for the hair; Bridal headpieces in the nature of ornamental hair combs; Cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair extensions and hair pieces; Clam clips for hair; Clown wigs; False hair; False hair for Japanese hair styling (kamoji); Human braiding hair; Oriental hair pins; Ornamental hair pins for Japanese hair styling (kogai); Pigtail ribbons for Korean hair style (Daeng-gi); Ponytail holders and hair ribbons; Ribbons for the hair; Rubber bands for hair; Synthetic braiding hair; Tape for fixing wigs; Toupees; Waving pins for the hair; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |