USPTO serial 87808064
GEENY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEENY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Housey
JANICE HOUSEY SYMBUS LAW GROUPPO BOX 777BERRYVILLE, VA 22611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and instruments for controlling electricity, namely, electrical controlling devices; Software for use in telecommunications data exchange; Computer software for enabling apparatus and machines to be networked and communicate with one another via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distribution of advertising materials for computer software; Marketing of services in the field of the internet of things, namely, marketing for the wholesaling and retailing of data processing apparatus, computer software enabling apparatus and machines to be networked and communicate with one another via the internet; Marketing services in the fields of data collection and data analysis; Compilation and evaluation of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing services in connection with online services, namely, the transmission of messages and information from machine to machine in the internet of things; Providing access to databases via computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; Technical design and planning of telecommunications equipment; Updating of software and database systems; Electronic storage of data in computer databases; Installation and maintenance of database software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |