USPTO serial 87810608
GOOD ENOUGH TO EAT SKINCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOOD ENOUGH TO EAT SKINCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosezena J. Pierce, Esq.
Rosezena J. Pierce, Esq. R.J. Pierce Law Group, P.C.205 N. Michigan Ave.SUITE 810Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty creams; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Beauty soap; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body butter; Body cream; Body cream soap; Body creams; Body lotions; Body masks; Body milk; Body milks; Body oil; Body oils; Body scrub; Cleansing and polishing preparations; Cleansing creams; Cleansing milk; Cleansing milk for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic olive oil for the face and body; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Facial cleansers; Facial creams; Facial masks; Facial oils; Facial scrubs; Lip balm; Lip cream; Lip gloss; Lip polisher; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Moisturizing creams; Moisturizing milk; Moisturizing milks; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Moisturizing solutions for the skin; Non-medicated body soaks; Non-medicated foot cream; Non-medicated herbal body care products, namely, body oils, salves, and lip balms; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated skin toners; Skin care preparation, namely, body polish; Skin care preparations, namely, fruit acid peels for skin; Skin cleansers; Skin conditioners; Skin creams; Skin lotion; Skin masks; Beauty creams for body care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetics sold as an integral component of non-medicated skincare preparations; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansing milk; Facial moisturizers; Fragranced facial moisturizer; Fragranced skin care preparations, namely, skin cleansers, facial cleansers, and facial moisturizers; Lotions for face and body care; Moisturizing body lotions; Non-medicated beauty soap; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Scented body lotions and creams; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin moisturizers used as cosmetics; Skin moisturizing gel; Skin toners; Wax for removing body hair; body moisturizers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |