USPTO serial 87811016
SUNBORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNBORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food for babies; Food for infants; Baby food; Dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; Glucose for use as an additive to foods for medical purposes; Nutritional food additives for medical purposes in the nature of natural food extracts derived from fruits or vegetables; Wheat-free and gluten-free pasta, crackers, pretzels, chips, cookies, cakes, cereal products, confectionary, noodles, and cereal-based snack foods, for the treatment of special medical and health conditions | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Bean-based snack foods; Cheese-based snack foods; Flaxseed oil for culinary purposes; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; Fruit-based organic food bars; Fruit-based organic food bars, also containing grains or nuts; Fruit-based organic food snacks also containing grains or nuts; Fruit-based raw food bars; Fruit-based snack food; Grapeseed oil for food; Insect-based snack foods; Laver-based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut clusters; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut crisps; Potato-based snack foods; Pressed fruit paste; Processed fruit- and nut-based food bars; Processed pulses; Pulse-based snack foods; Seed-based snack foods; Snack food dips; Soy-based snack foods; Toddler meals, namely, dried meal mixes for preparing entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Vegetable-based raw food bars; Vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food condiment consisting primarily of ketchup and salsa; Food flavourings, other than essential oils; Food flavourings, other than essential oils, and seasonings; Bean flour; Candy for food; Cereal based energy bars; Cereal-based snack foods; Coffee-based snack foods; Corn chips; Corn fingers; Corn-based snack foods; Extracts used as food flavoring; Extruded corn snacks; Flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; Flavourings of tea, other than essential oils, for food or beverages; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for foods; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for soups; Fruit paste for flavouring of food; Grain-based snack foods; Gram flour; Multigrain-based snack foods; Plantain flour; Processed seeds used as a flavoring for foods and beverages; Puffed corn snacks; Quinoa-based snack foods; Rice-based snack foods; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Snack foods, namely, chocolate-based snack foods; Toddler meals, namely, dried meal mixes for preparing entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Wheat-based snack foods; Yam flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cheetah Development Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Cheetah Development Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUNBORN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |