USPTO serial 87811114
GREEN CHOICE BUILDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN CHOICE BUILDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Lincer
Brian A. Lincer THE INTERNICOLA LAW FIRM115 Maple AvenueRed Bank, NJ 07701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Advisory services relating to building; advisory services relating to building construction materials; advisory services relating to building refurbishment; advisory services relating to property development building and construction services; advisory services relating to the alteration of buildings; advisory services relating to the construction of buildings; advisory services relating to the maintenance of buildings; advisory services relating to the repair of buildings; building (construction) supervision; building and construction of real estate subdivisions and developments; building and construction services; building construction; building construction advisory services; building construction consultancy; building construction supervision; building consultancy services; building demolition; building insulating; building maintenance; building of apartment buildings; building of commercial properties; building of houses; building of industrial properties; building of offices; building project management; building project management (building construction supervision); building refurbishment services; building repair; building repairs; building services; construction of buildings; demolition of buildings; development of property (building and construction services); dismantling of buildings; erection of pre-fabricated buildings; house building; housing development (building and construction services); installation of fittings for buildings; interior refurbishment of buildings; maintenance and repair of building contents; maintenance and repair of buildings; maintenance of buildings; on-site building project management; paiting and decorating of buildings; painting of buildings; project preparation relating to building renovation; property development (building and construction services); providing information, including online, about building construction, and repair and installation services; provision of information in relation to building construction; refurbishment of buildings; renovation of buildings; restoration of buildings; supervision of building construction; supervision of building work; wrecking of buildings (demolition) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |