USPTO serial 87811332
CHASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Apopka, FL
Apopka, FL
Redford, MI
Redford, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instrument accessories, namely, stands, cases, carrying bags and storage bags; Musical instrument cases for Woodwinds Brass Percussion; Musical instrument stands; Musical instrument tuning apparatus, namely, Instrument tuner; Musical instruments; Musical instruments in the nature of steel drums; Musical instruments, namely, musical chimes; Musical instruments, namely, bass guitars; Musical instruments, namely, gongs; Musical instruments, namely, lutes; Musical instruments, namely, pedal steel guitars; Musical instruments, namely, rattles; Musical instruments, namely, rhythm machines; Musical instruments, namely, spoons; Musical instruments, namely, steel drums; Musical instruments, namely, string basses; Musical instruments, namely, All Woodwinds and brass Strings Drums Saxophones Pianos Trumpets Flutes Clarinets Oboes Bassoon; Bags specially adapted for holding musical instruments; Balalaikas; Bandonions; Barrel organs; Bellows for musical instruments; Bows for musical instruments; Bridges for musical instruments; Buccins; Carillons; Carrying cases for musical instruments; Cases for musical instruments; Catgut for musical instruments; Colophony for stringed musical instruments; Dampers for musical instruments; Drum machines; Drums; Drums; Electric and electronic musical instruments; Electric carillons; Electronic musical instruments; Electronic practice mutes for musical instruments; Fingerboards for stringed musical instruments; Foot pedals for use in connection with musical instruments; Handbells; Japanese traditional musical instruments; Keys for musical instruments; Mallets for musical instruments; Mandolines; Morin khuur; Mouthpieces for musical instruments; Mutes for musical instruments; Pedals for musical instruments; Pegs for musical instruments; Phase shifters for musical instruments; Recorders; Replacement parts and fittings for musical instruments; Rosin for stringed musical instruments; Shoulder rests for musical instruments, namely, Tubas All Brass and woodwinds; Sistrums; Stands for musical instruments; Stringed musical instruments; Strings for musical instruments; Strings for western musical instruments; Strings for Western style musical instruments; Triangles; Tuners for musical instruments; Tuners for electronic musical instruments; Tuning apparatus for musical instruments; Valves for musical instruments; Western style musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rasheed Najee Jerome
- Other trademarks owned by Rasheed Najee Jerome
- Other trademarks owned by McKinney Darron Curtis
- Other trademarks owned by McKinney Darron Curtis
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named CHASER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |