USPTO serial 87812611
XPECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5897963Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2019
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XPECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Lingard
Thomas L. Lingard Ray Quinney & Nebeker36 South States StreetSuite 1400Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant growth nutrients, namely, reacted plant nutrients with key nutrients for improved plant growth; fertilizers and fertilizer products, namely, nutrient fertilizers and harvest aids being fertilizers; plant growth preparations; plant growth preparations for agricultural use; plant growth preparations for turf use; agricultural chemicals except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; turf care chemicals, namely, buffering agents, anti-foaming agents, defoamers, humectants, sequestering agents, desiccants, spread-stickers in the nature adjuvants for use with agricultural chemicals and plant growth regulators; agricultural chemicals, namely, buffering agents, anti-foaming agents, defoamers, humectants, sequestering agents, desiccants, spread-stickers in the nature of adjuvants for use with agricultural chemicals and plant growth regulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Herbicides; weed control preparations; turf care formulations and chemicals, namely, fungicides, herbicides, pesticides, bactericides, nematicides, molluscicides, synergist insecticides, fumigants, rodenticides, attractants for pest control purposes and repellants for pest control purposes; weed killer; insecticides; agricultural chemicals, namely, fungicides, herbicides, pesticides, bactericides, nematicides, molluscicides, synergist insecticides, fumigants, rodenticides, attractants for pest control purposes and repellants for pest control purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redox Chemicals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Redox Chemicals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Redox Chemicals, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named XPECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |