Drawing for EUREKA INDUSTRIAL

USPTO serial 87813717

EUREKA INDUSTRIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHWARZ, KATHLEEN MICHELLE HUD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUREKA INDUSTRIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREET22ND FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software that leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms and models to optimize business processes in the field of industry for the development of digital virtual agents, predictive systems, insights generation, recommender systems, semantic knowledge graphs, cognitive process simulation, computational linguistics and understanding, automation, visual computing applications; computer application software for enabling machine learning, natural language processing, genetic and deep learning algorithms, semantic ontologies, pattern recognition and knowledge modeling technologies in the field of industry; computer application software for developing, recognizing, and facilitating cognitive enhancement to drive relevant experiences and productivity, accelerating processes, automation and autonomy in the field of industry; optimization, personalization and decision support systems, namely, computer hardware and computer software for analyzing data, computer application software for developing predictive systems, decision circuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 18, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance