USPTO serial 87814460
YETIFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, JAMES T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YETIFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
00-102 Warszawa, PL
00-102 Warszawa, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID ORMS
DAVID ORMS POLSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCPO BOX 1403BROOMFIELD, CO 80038-1403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in consumer relationship management (CRM); computer software packages consisting of computer software for use in consumer relationship management (CRM); freeware for use in consumer relationship management (CRM); downloadable software for use in consumer relationship management (CRM); computer software downloadable from global computer information networks for use in consumer relationship management (CRM) | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | software development for others in the field of computer software configuration management; installation of computer software; software as a service featuring software for use in consumer relationship management (CRM); rental of computer software; advisory relating to computer software; maintenance and updating of computer software; design, development and implementation of software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for use in consumer relationship management (CRM) accessible via a web site; providing virtual computer systems through cloud computing; providing rental of electronic memory space on the internet; all of the aforesaid services for use in consumer relationship management (CRM) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 14, 2019 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |