USPTO serial 87814716
MORE CROP PER DROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2019
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with MORE CROP PER DROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
Brian M. Davis VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RD STE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Equipment for drip irrigation systems, namely, single or multi-outlet emitters connected to tubing in the nature of irrigation sprinklers | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2001 |
| 042 | Remote and on-site irrigation systems monitoring services to ensure proper functioning; Irrigation systems analysis and research services, namely, product research and development; Design and development of irrigation systems hardware and software; Monitoring irrigation systems for quality control purposes; Monitoring irrigation systems to ensure proper functioning; Custom design and development of irrigation systems hardware and software; Design, development and consulting services related thereto in the field of irrigation systems hardware and software; Design, development and implementation of monitoring software for irrigation systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing remote monitoring and decision-support tools to the agricultural industry | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MORE CROP PER DROP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 9, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |