Drawing for INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT AS A SERVICE

USPTO serial 87815209

INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT AS A SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT AS A SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abraham Lichy

Abraham Lichy The Lichy Law Firm, P.C.222 East 68th StreetNew York, NY 10065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in data analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2019PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 5, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 3, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 15, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 20, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance