USPTO serial 87815229
GUARD-EX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUARD-EX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Young
James L. Young Westman, Champlin & Koehler P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Driver impairment detection devices in the nature of heart rate, blood pressure, muscle tone, brain wave, body temperature, nystagmus, convergence, pupil dilation and biological and vital sign recognition scanners for use in determining the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle; ophthalmologic apparatuses, namely, electronic eye scanners that use light stimuli for measuring eye pupil movement patterns in order to determine the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle after drug or alcohol use; ophthalmologic apparatuses that use light stimuli to measure eye pupil movement patterns to determine the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle; eye scanners for use in measuring a user's level of intoxication; eye scanners for use in roadside sobriety tests; driver impairment detection devices, namely, eye scanners for use in detecting a user's degree of impairment after consuming marijuana to determine the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle; driver impairment detection devices, namely, eye scanners for use in detecting a user's degree of impairment after consuming drugs or alcohol to determine the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle; iris scanners for use in digitally identifying individuals; driver impairment detection devices which use artificial intelligence and machine learning to detect impairment, namely, electronic eye scanners for use in detecting a user's degree of impairment after consuming drugs or alcohol to determine the driver's fitness to operate a vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |