Drawing for EMERGENT

USPTO serial 87816751

EMERGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMERGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

Jeffrey C. Katz DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising, public relations, publicity, sales promotion, and marketing services; search engine marketing services; consultancy, research and information services concerning the aforesaid; business media research and consultancy; Media buying advice, namely, advising the client how much media time, and at what times the client should be purchasing advertising; planning, buying and negotiating advertising and media space and time; business research, investigation, consultancy services in the field of advertising and marketing; business advisory services; business planning and business strategy development services; production of advertising matter and commercials; market research and market analysis; market support services, namely, development of marketing strategies; statistical analysis and compilation of data for business purposes; provision of information relating to the aforesaid; provision of the aforesaid services on-line from a computer database or the Internet; Business consulting, information, research and analytics services in connection with the planning, purchasing, placement and optimization of online, interactive, television, cable, broadband, mobile and related new media inventory; all of the foregoing excluding business management consultancy in the fields of information technology and employee motivation and performanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance