USPTO serial 87818207
IOV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IOV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glacis Road, GI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dmitriy O. Makarov
DMITRIY O. MAKAROV IPHORGAN LTD.195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD, SUITE #125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; hardware for computer networks; hardware for data processing; hardware for data protection; hardware for encryption; hardware for data communication; hardware for data transmission; software; downloadable software; data processing software; computer software; computer software in the field of blockchain; computer software in the field of smart contracts; computer software for use in relation to artificial intelligence and/or machine learning; software for encryption; software for enabling secure financial transactions; software for processing and transferring electronic cash, digital currency, digital money, virtual money, virtual currency; software application for computer; software for data protection; databases; data networks; data networks of block chains; data network of smart contracts; data storage devices; devices for data bases; data processing equipment; software providing services via API | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | hardware development; consulting services in the field of hardware development; developing hardware in the field of data transmission and data protection; developing hardware in the field of cryptography; developing hardware for data conversion; developing hardware for software using blockchain technology; designing software; developing software; developing software for smart contracts; developing software using blockchain technology; software engineering; developing software for protecting data; consulting in the field of software development; software engineering for data processing programs; customer specific software development; development of data processing programs; updating software data bases; development of algorithm; developing software for data bases; developing software for data processing; developing software in the field of artificial intelligence; developing software providing services via API; data conversion of electronic information; data encryption and decoding services; data migration services; creation, development and maintenance of software for conducting financial transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |