USPTO serial 87818381
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2019
- Examiner
- REID, MONICA R
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSOCIATES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
SAN JOSE, CA
Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seth L. Hudson
Seth L. Hudson MAYNARD NEXSEN PC227 West Trade StreetSuite 2300Charlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Consulting in the field of repair and maintenance services for power plants, pipelines and structures in the power generation industries | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2018 |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of engineering, namely, design of repair and maintenance systems for power plants, pipelines and structures in the power generation industries; Technical consultation in the field of power plant engineering, namely, inspection, maintenance assessment, testing, analysis and evaluation of power plant equipment, pipelines, and structures in the power generation industries, to monitor and improve performance and efficiency of such equipment, pipelines, and structures | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Integrity Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |