Drawing for THE SCIENCE FOR BETTER LIVING

USPTO serial 87819314

THE SCIENCE FOR BETTER LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SCIENCE FOR BETTER LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell Mehlman

MITCHELL MEHLMAN Murtha Cullina2232 WILLOW GROVE WAYTHE VILLAGES, FL 32162

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Drug delivery agents in the form of pellets that facilitate the delivery of medicinal pharmaceutical hormone preparations for the treatment of endocrine disorders; drug delivery systems comprised of drug delivery agents in the form of pellets that facilitate the delivery of medicinal pharmaceutical hormone preparations for the treatment of endocrine disorders, and drug pellet loading and insertion tools, namely, hypodermic needles and scalpels, sold as a kitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 10, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 18, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 13, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance