Drawing for INNOVATIVE INITIATIVES & RESEARCH CENTRAL

USPTO serial 87824131

INNOVATIVE INITIATIVES & RESEARCH CENTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADCLIFF, BRENT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATIVE INITIATIVES & RESEARCH CENTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael W. Goltry

MICHAEL W. GOLTRY PARSONS & GOLTRY15615 NORTH 71ST STREET, SUITE 106SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business development services; Business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; Consulting services, namely, organizational development services in the nature of providing assistance in the development of strategies, models, and creative ideation in the fields of business, economics, science, social sciences, and arts; Business advisory and consultancy services in the fields of marketing, finance, business management, economics, science, social sciences, and arts; Providing economic consultation in the fields of farming, agriculture, energy, trade, transportation, commodities; Consultancy and advisory services in the fields of business and economics, namely, farming, agriculture, energy, trade, transportation, commodities; Research and analysis in the fields of business; Business management services and business development services in the nature of design of business models, economic models, science models, and social science models; Development of concepts in the fields of business, economics, science, social sciences, and artsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the fields of business, economics, science, social sciences, and arts; Research in the field of the arts; Research and analysis in the field of social sciences, namely, economics, political science, education, history, communication studies, geography, law, psychology, public healthACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the fields of science, namely, natural science, engineering science, technology science, medical science, health care sciences environmental science, agricultural science; Social science consultancyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2018GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Apr 17, 2018CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance