Drawing for XCELLENT

USPTO serial 87825188

XCELLENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XCELLENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Shaw McBee

Susan E. Shaw McBee MCBEE MOORE & VANIK IP, LLC7900 WESTPARK DRIVESUITE A100MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical and veterinary preparations and articles, namely, oncological, anti-viral, anti-bacterial and autoimmunity pharmaceuticals and natural remedies, and diagnostic preparations for medical purposesACTIVE—
042Medical and pharmacological research services; consultancy pertaining to pharmacologyACTIVE—
044Medical and pharmacological diagnostic services, namely, medical and pharmacological diagnosis of oncological, viral, bacterial and autoimmunity diseases; medical consulting services in the field of oncological, viral, bacterial and autoimmunity diseasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2024FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jan 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 15, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 15, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 11, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2019ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance