USPTO serial 87825577
AYOUB CARPET SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5599838Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2018
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AYOUB CARPET SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chantilly, VA, US
Chantilly, VA, US
Chantilly, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH L MEADOWS
JOSEPH L MEADOWS GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP277 S WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 550ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Danco Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Danco Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Danco Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named AYOUB CARPET SERVICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2026 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED IN PART/DENIED IN PART 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 26, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |