USPTO serial 87828022
CHERRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2021
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CHERRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HUNTINGTON, NY, US
HUNTINGTON, NY, US
HUNTINGTON, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M ROSSELLI
THOMAS M ROSSELLI WEBER ROSSELLI & CANNON LLP7 SKYLINE DRIVESUITE 350HAWTHORNE, NY 10532Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Electronic cigarette liquid comprised of non-ingestible, non-medicinal essential oils and infused with vitamins, all of the foregoing containing CBD derived from industrial hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Electronic cigarette liquid comprised of non-ingestible, non-medicinal essential oils and infused with vitamins and not including hemp, CBD or any other cannabis derived ingredients | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 034 | Vaping devices, namely, electronic cigarettes; vaping oils, namely, electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings and infused with vitamins in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; vaping refill cartridges, namely, electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; vaping refill cartridges, namely, cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; all of the foregoing containing, or used with CBD derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHERRY BRANDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHERRY BRANDING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHERRY BRANDING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named CHERRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2021 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2020 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |