Drawing for A3R

USPTO serial 87828264

A3R

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A3R?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randy Friedberg

Randy Friedberg WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP7 TIMES SQ STE 2900NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automated process control system, namely, micro-processor based hardware used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors; Automated systems, namely, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; Computer hardware for upload, storage, retrieval, download, transmission and delivery of digital content;Computer hardware for controlling industrial robots; Computer hardware for logistics management; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instrumentsACTIVE—
012Autonomous mobile robotic transport vehicles used to carry a variety of payloads from one place to another in academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields; unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned watercraft vehicles for use in research and data collection in academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fieldsACTIVE—
042Providing in-house and on-site computer systems integration of the autonomy platform and fleets of robotic transport vehicles and industrial robots and components thereof on behalf of third parties in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fields; providing and integrating third party hardware to meet client requirements for deployment of autonomous mobile robots and fleets thereof; providing IT consulting and support services in the nature of IT integration services relating to the deployment of autonomous mobile robots and fleets thereof and related technologies in the academic, military, mining, agricultural, retail, residential, first responder, warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2019ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 24, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance