USPTO serial 87831207
AZTECUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AZTECUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Pizza stones; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric French presses(Based on Intent to Use) Coffee cups; Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Coffee filters not of paper being part of non-electric coffee makers; Coffee grinders, hand-operated; Coffee mugs; Coffee percolators, non-electric; Coffee pod holders; Coffee pots; Coffee pots not of precious metal; Coffee pots of precious metal; Coffee scoops; Coffee servers; Coffee stirrers; Pizza paddles; Pizza peels; Pizza tray stands; Pressed glass; Battery-operated cookie presses; Disposable beverage lid with an integrated press and plunger for placement on any cup for the purpose of infusing beverages; Electric trouser presses; Fruit presses, non-electric, for household purposes; Fruit muddlers; Garlic presses; Grill presses; Hand-operated coffee grinders; Hand-operated coffee grinders and pepper mills; Hand-operated cherry pitters; Hand-operated claw crackers; Hand-operated cookie presses; Hand-operated lobster shell crackers; Japanese style earthenware mortars for kitchen use (suribachi); Japanese style wooden pestles for kitchen use (surikogi); Kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; Molcajete and tejolete for kitchen use; Mortars for kitchen use; Non-electric coffee dripper for brewing coffee; Non-electric coffee percolators; Non-electric coffee pots; Non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal; Non-electric coffee servers not of precious metal; Non-electric coffee servers of precious metal; Non-electric garlic peeler sleeves; Non-electric ice cream makers; Non-electric ice crushers; Non-electric mincers; Non-electric tortilla presses; Non-electric trouser presses; Non-electric yogurt makers; Non-electric, pour-over coffee filters not of paper for brewing coffee; Non-electrical coffee grinders; Nut crackers; Nut crackers not of precious metal; Nut crackers of precious metal; Nutcrackers; Nutcrackers not of precious metal; Nutcrackers of precious metal; Pestles for kitchen use; Soapstone cubes for chilling whiskey; Tie presses; Trouser presses | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |