Drawing for BIOREACTORBOT

USPTO serial 87832505

BIOREACTORBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOREACTORBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN KREIDER GAUNT

KAREN KREIDER GAUNT DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 E 5TH STREET, SUITE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robots which incorporate a bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried outACTIVE—
009Bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried out for use in cell culturing; Bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried out for laboratory use; Laboratory robots which incorporate a bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried out; Bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried out which incorporate robots for laboratory useACTIVE—
011Bioreactor for providing an environment in which biological and chemical processes are carried out for use in the treatment of biomaterials, biologic tissue, cellular materials, cellular cultures, biologic cultures and biochemicalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 15, 2020RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 20, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 26, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2020RMDTEXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB—
Dec 2, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 26, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 27, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance