Drawing for EXADATA

USPTO serial 87832604

EXADATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5778721Status 702Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 18, 2019
Examiner
BECHHOFER, YOCHEVED D
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with EXADATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Arkowitz

Jennifer D. Arkowitz Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900San Francisco, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing platforms as a service (PaaS) and infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring computer software and hardware platforms for creating web applications, data storage and backup, database management, virtualization, networking, collaboration, access, support, cloud computing, data sharing, data security, administration and management of computer software and hardware, and distribution and transmission of data and information; computer services, namely, providing databases as a service (DBaaS), namely, cloud hosting of computer databases for others; computer services, namely, providing data as a service through a customizable software platform for collecting, analyzing, integrating, transforming and providing access to data and information; technological services, namely, data warehousing services; technological services, namely, hosting, managing, provisioning, scaling, administering, maintaining, monitoring, securing, encrypting, decrypting, replicating and backing up databases for others; technological services, namely, software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in database management, data access, data extraction and reporting and query functionality for management of data; technological services, namely, cloud computing featuring software for use in database management and data warehousing; technological services, namely, cloud hosting of electronic databases; technological services, namely, electronic data storage; technological services, namely, providing database servers of variable capacity to others; technological services, namely, rental of computing and data storage facilities of variable capacity to third parties; technological services, namely, data encryption and decoding services; technological services, namely, management of on-line databases for others; technological services, namely, provision of non-downloadable software applications for data processing; technological services, namely, provision of non-downloadable software applications for accessing to databases; technological services, namely, provision of non-downloadable software applications for electronic data transmission; technological services, namely, providing access to remotely hosted computer applications through the internet; technological services, namely, computer security services in the nature of maintaining security and integrity of databases and digital information by restricting unauthorized access to cloud-based platform services, cloud-based infrastructure services, cloud-based database services, computer software and hardware platforms, electronic databases, cloud-based databases, remotely hosted computer applications through the internet, hard drives, computer networks, websitesACTIVEOct 26, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2025NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2025C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 3, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2025E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2024REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 18, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance