Drawing for GENIUS

USPTO serial 87836064

GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PASSMAN, NICOLE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E Innis

MARY E INNIS INNIS LAW GROUP LLC321 N CLARK STREET SUITE 2465CHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Steam cleaning machines in the nature of steam mops for household use in cleaning floorsACTIVESep 28, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 16, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 25, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2020EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Feb 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2019GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 20, 2019GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 7, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance