Drawing for ATHLON GAMES

USPTO serial 87836399

ATHLON GAMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATHLON GAMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSHUA R. BRESSLER

JOSHUA R. BRESSLER BRESSLER LAW PLLC3 WEST 35 ST., 9 FLNEW YORK, NY 10001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, software as a service featuring video game software for playing live video and computer gamesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for enabling users to create, upload, and share user-generated videos based on computer game play; Software as a service featuring software for enabling users to create, upload, and share user-generated videos based on computer game play; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for enabling play of computer games; Software as a service featuring software for enabling play of computer games; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring a software platform for enabling videogame distribution and community management; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for enabling play of live videogames; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to create, upload, and share user-generated videos based on computer game playACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2019GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 2, 2019CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance