Drawing for CHARTER, FAR SMARTER

USPTO serial 87840003

CHARTER, FAR SMARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARTER, FAR SMARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerre B. Swann, Jr.

Jerre B. Swann, Jr. Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for searching, reserving, purchasing and organizing flights on private aircraftACTIVE—
035Business management services, namely, aircraft management for othersACTIVE—
039Airplane chartering; Chartering of private jets; Flight planning services; Transportation reservation services; Coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groupsACTIVE—
045Personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance