USPTO serial 87841667
SMART SWEETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART SWEETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seong-Cheol Son
SEONG-CHEOL SON PALMER IP INC.704 - 1478 WEST HASTINGS STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6G3J6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [BASED ON SECTION 1(a) USE] Gummies; Confectionery fruit jellies; Fruit-based confectionery; Fruit jellies; Sugar-free gummies; Sugarless gummies; Sugar-free jellies; Sugarless jellies; Candies; Fruit jelly candies; Candy for food; [BASED ON SECTION 1(b) INTENT TO USE] Chocolates; Marshmallows; Hard candy; Chocolate confectionery; Chocolate candies; Chocolate and chocolates; Candy-coated nuts; Candy-coated fruits; Mints; Candy mints; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate covered fruits; Peppermint candy; Toffee candies; Toffee; Taffy; Taffy candies; Caramels; Chewing gum; Sugar-free chewing gum; Sugarless chewing gum; Bubble gum; Licorice; Panned candy; Candy twists; Sour candy straws; Licorice laces | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2015 |
| 035 | [BASED ON SECTION 1(a) USE] Online, retail, and wholesale sales of gummies, confectionery fruit jellies, fruit-based confectionery, fruit jellies, sugar-free gummies, sugarless gummies, sugar-free jellies, sugarless jellies, candies, fruit jelly candies and candy for food; [BASED ON SECTION 1(b) INTENT TO USE]Online, retail, and wholesale sales of chocolates, marshmallows, hard candy, chocolate confectionery, chocolate candies, chocolate and chocolates, candy-coated nuts, candy-coated fruits, mints, candy mints, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate covered fruits, peppermint candy, toffee candies, toffee, taffy, taffy candies, caramels, chewing gum, sugar-free chewing gum, sugarless chewing gum, bubble gum, licorice, panned candy, candy twists, sour candy straws, and licorice laces | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |