USPTO serial 87843603
ITD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2025
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with ITD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
Oakville, Ontario, CA
OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
Oakville, Ontario, CA
OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alisa C. Simmons
Alisa C. Simmons FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 S LASALLE ST STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60603United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(e)) Drain structures for use in showers and baths, namely, testable rough-in metal drain pipes for freestanding bath tubs and testable rough-in metal drain traps for freestanding tubs | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Testable rough-in for freestanding bath tubs in the nature of drains for testing rough-in plumbing for freestanding bath tubs; plumbing fittings, namely, drains; plumbing supplies, namely, strainers for plumbing drains, sink strainers; drain structures for use in showers and baths | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2014 |
| 019 | (Based on 44(e)) Drain structures for use in showers and baths, namely, testable rough-in non-metal drain pipes for testing rough-in plumbing for freestanding bath tubs and testable rough-in non-metal drain traps for freestanding bath tubs | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on 44(e)) Drain structures for use in showers and baths, namely, testable rough-in drain stoppers for freestanding bath tubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
- Other trademarks owned by OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
- Other trademarks owned by OAKVILLE STAMPING & BENDING LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ITD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 14, 2022 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |