Drawing for ULTRA MERGED

USPTO serial 87845035

ULTRA MERGED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKSON, RACHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA MERGED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M. GOLDMAN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIRVINE, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for development tools for developing, deploying, and executing computer systems, computer applications, and application programming interfaces (API); providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for developing, deploying, and executing computer systems, computer applications, and application programming interfaces (API); platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms and software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable software for simulating and managing computer applications, operating systems, and data; providing temporary use of non- downloadable software for accessing, viewing, sharing, creating, managing, modifying, replicating, updating, using, linking, and virtualizing data over computer networks; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software in the nature of open source computing software for development, deployment, and execution of scalable computer services on data container hosting platforms, servers, graphics processing units (GPUs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and neural network processors; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools for development, deployment, and execution of Function as a Service (FaaS) services on container hosting platforms, servers, graphics processing units (GPUs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and neural network processors; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing a virtual computing environment accessible via the Internet for the purpose of application development, deployment, execution, and management; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in electronic storage of data and for processing data from streaming data sources in the form of internet of things (IoT) edge devices, cameras, and sensors; design and development of computer software for cloud storage of data; electronic data storage; infrastructure as a service (IaaS) featuring temporary use of non-downloadable cloud based software for secure file storage, transfer, distribution, and sharing; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for secure file storage, transfer, distribution, and sharing; computer technology consulting services in the field of distributed ledgers and blockchain-based technology; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in accessing, reading, tracking, and using blockchain technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 23, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance