Drawing for ECHOMD

USPTO serial 87845710

ECHOMD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECHOMD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth M. Goldman

BETH M. GOLDMAN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIRVINE, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer software for medical imaging apparatusACTIVE—
010Medical devices and apparatus, namely, ultrasound imaging apparatus, apparatus for performing echocardiograms, scanners and needle guides, and parts and fittings thereofACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use as a spreadsheet, for use in database management and data analytics, for use in word processing, for use in image processing and analysis, in the field of medical imagingACTIVE—
044Medical assistance services; medical assistance services in the nature of medical information provided to medical professionals from remote locations via the Internet and global computer networks through the use of archived medical images and a data storage and retrieval systemACTIVE—
045Licensing of technology in the field of medical imaging, namely, licensing of computer software, hardware, and medical devices and apparatus in the field of medical imagingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance