Drawing for CALPAC

USPTO serial 87845862

CALPAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALPAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip R. Zender

Philip R. Zender SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP275 BATTERY STREET, SUITE 2600SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting conferences, seminars, workshops and webinars in the medical field; providing on-line publications in the nature of e-zines, articles and newsletters in the fields of medicine, the practice of medicine, the betterment of the medical profession, and public health policyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 15, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 4, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 12, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 29, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2018MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance