Drawing for DYNACUT HRCM

USPTO serial 87850028

DYNACUT HRCM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNACUT HRCM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

Mark J. Liss LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mining machines, namely, cutting machines for continuous mining of hard rock; parts and accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely, cutter heads and discs, crawler chains, electric motors for cutting machines, conveyors and conveyor chainsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 25, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 25, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 19, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2020PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 11, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 4, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance