Drawing for AZIMUTH GROOMING

USPTO serial 87857154

AZIMUTH GROOMING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZIMUTH GROOMING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra Summers

Alexandra Summers SAUSSER SUMMERS, PC4846 Payton StreetSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated beard oils; Beard pomades; Beard butters; Non-medicated Scalp oils; Scalp powders; After shave lotions; Colognes; Perfumes; Wax for hair removal; Body wash; Shampoo; Hair conditioner; Leave in hair conditioner; Deodorant for personal use; AntiperspirantACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance