Drawing for AMCREST

USPTO serial 87857281

AMCREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMCREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul R. Juhasz

PAUL R. JUHASZ THE JUHASZ LAW FIRM, P.C.10777 WESTHEIMER, STE 1100HOUSTON, TX 77042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone communications equipment, namely, voice over IP communications servers; voice over IP telephones, voice over IP software for operating private branch exchange; voice over IP analog telephone adaptors; and voice over IP public telephone switch network adaptors; software for telecommunications services, namely, software for the operation and management of telephone communication, facsimile, voicemail, call processing, call waiting and internet telephony (VoIP) serviceACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing local and long distance telephone services, online facsimile transmission and retrieval services, unified messaging, voice mail, call processing, call waiting, and voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) servicesACTIVE—
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for telecommunications services, namely, for use in the operation and management of local and long distance telephone services, online facsimile transmission, unified messaging, voice mail, call processing, call waiting, and voice over Internet protocol (VOIP)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance