Drawing for H-IQ

USPTO serial 87857865

H-IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H-IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill J. Chalmers

JILL J. CHALMERS BRYAN CAVE LLP90 SOUTH CASCADE AVENUE, SUITE 1300COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cabinets and carts specially adapted for use in connection with storage and integration with RFID technology and software interfaces to provide a continual and seamless communication of inventory information on medical ready-for-use products that are securely stored in identified locations; storage carts and cabinets specially adapted for fitting with RFID technology, readers, and transmitters for the storage, location, disbursement, tracking and management of inventory, products and supplies and for use with third party software to report inventory movements, items stored, and information related to items being stored; storage carts and cabinets specially adapted and fitted with RFID technology, including readers, microprocessors, and wireless transmitters for the securing, storage, location, disbursement, tracking, reporting and management of inventory, products and supplies, and for the use with third party software to report inventory movements, items stored, and information related to items being stored; cabinets and carts systems specially adapted for fitting with RFID technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 5, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance