USPTO serial 87861913
CBDAYU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CBDAYU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lincolnwood, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jams; Jellies and jams; Jellies for food; Jellies, jams; Apple butter; Fruit butters; Fruit jellies; Fruit spreads; Fruit- and nut-based snack bars featuring a chocolate coating; Fruit-based spreads; Fruit-based meal replacement bars; Fruit-based meal replacement bars for boosting energy; Fruit-based organic food bars; Fruit-based raw food bars; Garlic butter; Garlic-based spread; Ginger jam; Hazelnut spread; Honey butter; Jellies; Lemon spread; Nut butters; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut- and dried fruit- based snack bars; Nut-based spread also containing chocolate; Nut-based spreads; Nut-based food bars; Nut-based snack bars; Olive pastes; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Peanut butter; Peanut spread; Pressed fruit paste; Pumpkin butter; Seed butters; Seed-based snack bars; Vegetable paste; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetable-based raw food bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |