Drawing for BLOCKCHAINDEFENDER

USPTO serial 87862981

BLOCKCHAINDEFENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLOCKCHAINDEFENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradford C. Craig

Bradford C. Craig BLANK ROME LLPOne Logan Square, 130 N. 18th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Anti-spyware software; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for protecting people from identity theft; Computer software for encryption; Computer software for guarding users of computers and remote access devices from identity theft, featuring various software tools, namely, anti-keyboard logger and keyboard stroke encryption; none of the foregoing relating to or for use in connection with vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 1, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 1, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 26, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2019OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 6, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2018TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
May 8, 2018PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance