USPTO serial 87863275
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D REICHMAN
JONATHAN D REICHMAN HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Electronic vaporizer liquid for use in electronic vaporizers, in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers, namely, flavorings, other than essential oils, in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic vaporizer liquid containing CBD for use in electronic vaporizers in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers, namely, chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges ;electronic vaporizer liquid containing CBD for use in electronic vaporizers, in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic cigarette components in the nature of electronic inhalation devices comprised of electronic cigarette refill cartridges, electronic cigarette atomizers, electronic cigarette cartomizers and electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin containing CBD distributed as a unit; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; electronic nicotine inhalation devices, namely, electronic cigarette vaporizers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |