Drawing for WEEDSTOCK

USPTO serial 87863275

WEEDSTOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEEDSTOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN D REICHMAN

JONATHAN D REICHMAN HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Electronic vaporizer liquid for use in electronic vaporizers, in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers, namely, flavorings, other than essential oils, in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic vaporizer liquid containing CBD for use in electronic vaporizers in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers, namely, chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges ;electronic vaporizer liquid containing CBD for use in electronic vaporizers, in the nature of e-cigarettes, e-cigars, and personal vaporizers; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic cigarette components in the nature of electronic inhalation devices comprised of electronic cigarette refill cartridges, electronic cigarette atomizers, electronic cigarette cartomizers and electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin containing CBD distributed as a unit; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; electronic nicotine inhalation devices, namely, electronic cigarette vaporizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 31, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 19, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 10, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 16, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 16, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 19, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2018MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance