USPTO serial 87866331
DART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic device comprised of Radio Frequency Front End (RFFE) containing power amplifiers, digital circuitry, high power analog filters, transceivers, linearizers, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) for digital signal processing, digital baseband unit, compact computer, Evolved Packet Core (EPC), and a power supply providing secure and private Long Term Evolution (LTE) network and management and monitoring of LTE network; computer hardware components for electronic device providing secure and private LTE network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | End-user training in the use of electronic device for providing, managing and monitoring private and secure LTE network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |