USPTO serial 87866646
WELL&
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELL&?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL D. FROHLING
DANIEL D. FROHLING LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK ST SUITE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing personal trainer services; country clubs; providing of tennis court facilities and golf courses; providing recreational areas in the nature of children's play rooms; creating playlists of music and multimedia content for others; conducting recreation and exercise events, namely, hiking, running, horseback riding, rock climbing, kayaking | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Hospitality services, namely, tourist inns and bed-and-breakfast inn services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Personalized concierge services for others, namely, making requested personal arrangements and reservations, including transportation services, home cleaning services, in-home repair and painting services, in-home technology services, personal shopping and ordering services, dinner, theatre and event reservation services and wake-up call services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Realty Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Realty Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named WELL&
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |