Drawing for WELLBEING

USPTO serial 87866788

WELLBEING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELLBEING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL D. FROHLING

DANIEL D. FROHLING LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N. CLARK ST. SUITE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Country clubs; providing of tennis court facilities and golf courses; providing recreational areas in the nature of children's play roomsACTIVE
043Hospitality services, namely, tourist inns and bed-and-breakfast inn servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 16, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 16, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2018CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Nov 6, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 16, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2018EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2018GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 14, 2018GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 14, 2018CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 16, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 10, 2018NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance